Portfolio rebalancing means buying and selling securities with the objective of moving the portfolio back to its target asset allocation. Rebalancing has two primary benefits for investors. First, rebalancing is demonstrated to enhance portfolio returns by as much as 0.5% per year. This is due to a phenomenon called mean reversion. Although returns on a particular asset class may be significantly over or under their expected return in the short term, they tend to revert to their long-term averages over time, so investors can benefit by selling (or buying) the asset allocation when its value is above (or below) its long-term average. The second benefit of rebalancing is risk reduction. When we help clients develop an Investment Policy, we are agreeing to implement a portfolio with a certain risk profile. As the actual allocation changes due to market movements, the portfolio becomes more or less risky. Rebalancing restores the desired level of risk to the portfolio. Because stock markets typically rise over long periods, rebalancers become net sellers of stocks, meaning that the long-term volatility of their portfolios is significantly less than that of portfolios which are never rebalanced.
Despite these benefits, studies have shown that most individual investors do not routinely rebalance their portfolios. Why is this? The contrarian, out-of-the-mainstream behavior required when rebalancing is quite uncomfortable for many investors. David Swenson, the former Chief Investment Officer at Yale University, wrote in his book Unconventional Success:
Our rebalancing process at Arcadia Private Wealth involves two steps: First, we compare the client's current asset allocation to the target asset allocation specified in their Investment Policy and determine whether rebalancing is necessary. Rather than rebalance on a strict periodic schedule, we allow portfolio allocations to float within bands around the target. For example, if the portfolio allocation to U.S. small cap stocks drops below the lower band, we will need to add U.S. small cap stock funds. If the allocation exceeds the upper band, we need to reduce the asset class. Second, once we decide that rebalancing is necessary, we choose the most cost-effective means of doing so. This is the most difficult step since the benefits of rebalancing can easily be nullified by excessive transaction costs or capital gains taxes. Our rebalancing plan typically consists of a combination of the following actions. In order of preference, we may:
Disclosure: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute personalized tax, legal, or investment advice. Tax rules are subject to change. Please consult a qualified financial advisor and CPA for guidance specific to your situation. Arcadia Private Wealth LLC is a Registered Investment Adviser in the state of California. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where we are properly registered or exempt from registration.

Grant Webster, CFP®, TPCP®
Founder, Wealth Advisor